Architecture that makes AI governance a structural property of every system you build and operate.

Three engagements, each designed for a specific moment in your AI governance journey. Each delivers something your board, your legal team, and your regulator can rely on — built from architectural evidence.

Engagement 01

AI Compliance Architecture Review

Fixed scope · Delivered as a signed Architecture Decision Record


Before you can govern your AI systems, you need a complete and accurate picture of them — including the ones you did not commission, the ones embedded in vendor platforms, and the ones teams deployed without a formal sign-off.

The Architecture Review is a fixed-scope engagement. We examine your AI systems directly — data flows, decision logic, human oversight mechanisms, vendor integrations, and audit trail structures — across your entire AI footprint. Every system in scope is mapped against applicable regulatory frameworks: EU AI Act, UK AI Framework, Canada AIDA, Singapore IMDA, and others relevant to your markets.

The deliverable is a signed Architecture Decision Record — a formal document produced by a certified enterprise AI architect, suitable for board presentation, legal review, and regulatory reference.

Addresses: Shadow AI Vendor & supply chain AI Audit readiness
What you receive
Complete AI inventory — every AI system in your enterprise mapped, including vendor-supplied capabilities, team-deployed tools, and embedded model APIs.
Risk classification per system — each system mapped to its applicable regulatory risk tier, grounded in architectural evidence and defensible under regulatory scrutiny.
Vendor obligation analysis — a clear account of what your AI supply chain requires of you contractually and architecturally under applicable frameworks.
Structural gap analysis — a precise account of the architecture decisions required to bring each system into full compliance, sequenced by regulatory priority.
Signed Architecture Decision Record — a formal, board-ready document suitable for regulatory reference, investor due diligence, and internal governance review.
This engagement is right for you if

Your organisation has AI systems in production — including AI embedded in vendor platforms and tools deployed by teams outside central IT — and needs a credible, complete assessment of your regulatory exposure. Typical clients are CCOs, General Counsels, and CTOs at European mid-to-large enterprises preparing for regulatory scrutiny, board governance reviews, or M&A due diligence.

Book a discovery call →
REVIEW engagement 01 DISCOVER CLASSIFY MAP RECORD AI INVENTORY Every system surfaced RISK TIER Each system classified ADR Signed deliverable Know exactly where you stand.
DESIGN flagship · engagement 02 EXPLAIN AUDIT HITL GOVERN XAI · SHAP Explainability at inference HITL Node Enforced oversight Audit Log Immutable by design Data Gov. Write-path embedded Compliance built in. Every layer.
Engagement 02

Compliance-by-Design Architecture

Project engagement · Production-ready architecture


The organisations that win with AI are the ones where governance enables deployment — where compliance is a structural property of the system, engineering ships with confidence, and the audit trail generates itself.

This is Data Domine's flagship engagement. We design or redesign your high-risk AI systems from the architecture up — working directly with your engineering leadership and product teams on Google Cloud and Vertex AI. Regulatory obligations are encoded as structural constraints at every layer: explainability at inference time using SHAP and GCP Explainable AI, human-in-the-loop checkpoints designed as enforced state machine nodes, immutable audit logs as a natural by-product of normal operations, and data governance embedded into the write path.

For agentic and multi-agent systems, we design the human oversight architecture that enforces accountability at every autonomous decision boundary — giving engineering the speed they need and legal the certainty they require.

Addresses: Trust collapse Agentic explosion Velocity vs governance Audit readiness
What you receive
Full compliance architecture — system design across all governance-relevant layers: data, model lifecycle, inference pipeline, HITL checkpoints, audit log architecture, and agentic oversight mechanisms.
Explainability at inference time — every consequential decision carries its own reasoning, built in using SHAP and GCP Explainable AI, satisfying EU AI Act Article 13 and equivalent transparency requirements.
Enforced human oversight — HITL checkpoints designed as structural state machine nodes, so autonomous systems escalate to human judgment at precisely the boundaries where accountability requires it.
Self-generating audit trail — immutable logs produced as a structural by-product of every operation, always current, always in a form that satisfies regulatory scrutiny.
Architecture Decision Records — formal documentation of every significant design decision, its rationale, and its compliance implications.
Engineering team enablement — your teams leave the engagement with the knowledge, patterns, and tooling to sustain and extend the architecture as your AI portfolio grows.
This engagement is right for you if

You are deploying or operating high-risk AI systems in regulated industries — healthcare, financial services, insurance, public sector — or building agentic AI capabilities where autonomous decision-making requires structural accountability. Equally suited to boutique GCP partners in DACH and Benelux who need a senior AI architect to lead compliance architecture on enterprise client engagements.

Book a discovery call →
Engagement 03

AI Governance Retainer

Ongoing · Monthly · Scales with your AI portfolio


AI governance is a continuous discipline. Regulatory guidance evolves. New systems enter production. Vendors update their models. The organisations that stay ahead are the ones with architectural oversight built into how they operate — every month.

The AI Governance Retainer gives your organisation a senior AI architect — available monthly — whose focus is the continued structural soundness of your AI governance posture. New deployments are reviewed before they go live. Vendor changes are assessed for architectural and regulatory impact. Shadow AI surfaced through internal monitoring gets classified and mapped. Your leadership team receives a clear, board-ready picture of where the portfolio stands.

For organisations that have completed a Compliance-by-Design engagement, the Retainer is the continuity layer. For organisations building their AI portfolio incrementally, it is the senior architectural voice that ensures every new system is governed from day one.

Addresses: All six situations · ongoing
What you receive — every month
Pre-production architecture review — every new AI system, vendor integration, and agentic capability entering your environment is assessed before it goes live.
Regulatory monitoring and impact assessment — new guidance from the European AI Office and other relevant authorities is assessed for architectural implications and communicated in plain language.
Ongoing shadow AI monitoring — team-deployed and vendor-embedded AI systems are identified, classified, and brought into the governance framework as they emerge.
Monthly governance report — a concise, board-ready summary of your AI portfolio's current compliance status, open architectural items, and priorities for the coming period.
Architecture advisory access — direct access to a senior AI architect for design questions, vendor decisions, and technology choices as they arise.
This engagement is right for you if

Your organisation is actively building and deploying AI systems — including vendor-supplied and team-deployed capabilities — and needs ongoing architectural oversight that keeps governance current across all six challenge areas as your portfolio and the regulatory landscape evolve.

Book a discovery call →
RETAIN engagement 03 MONITOR REPORT REVIEW ADVISE Pre-prod review every month Shadow AI monitored continuously Monthly governance report Regulatory impact assessment Current, always. Every month.

Before you book a call.

We use AI embedded in SaaS platforms and APIs. Are those in scope?

Yes — and they are often the most significant area of regulatory exposure. Under the EU AI Act and equivalent frameworks, your organisation carries obligations for AI you deploy regardless of whether you built it. The Review maps every AI system in your environment, including vendor-supplied and embedded capabilities, and establishes the controls required to satisfy those obligations.

Our AI systems are not built on Google Cloud. Can you still help?

The Architecture Review and the Governance Retainer are platform-agnostic — AI governance is an architectural question regardless of the underlying stack. The Compliance-by-Design engagement is delivered on Google Cloud and Vertex AI. If your systems are on a different platform, we discuss that on the discovery call and scope accordingly.

We are a GCP partner looking to bring in a senior architect for a client engagement. Is that something Data Domine does?

Working with boutique GCP partners in DACH and Benelux is a core part of how we engage. If you have won an enterprise engagement that requires a senior AI architect with deep regulatory and agentic AI architecture experience, that conversation is worth having. Reach out directly.

Do you work across jurisdictions beyond the EU?

Yes. Data Domine is a remote-first practice. We design to the EU AI Act as the architectural gold standard, which means the systems we deliver satisfy UK, Canadian, Singaporean, and US frameworks simultaneously. We work with enterprises and GCP partners across all jurisdictions where AI governance regulation is active or approaching.

How quickly can an engagement begin?

Architecture Reviews typically begin within one to two weeks of the discovery call. Compliance-by-Design engagements are scoped over one to two calls before a start date is agreed. Retainers usually begin within two weeks of agreement.

The right engagement starts with the right conversation.

Tell us about your AI systems and where you are in your governance journey. We will come to the call prepared, and you will leave with a clear picture of what the engagement looks like and what it delivers.

Book a discovery call →